Filed under: Gebet, faith statistics, prayer, statistics, statistik | Tags: Gebet, prayer, prayer statistics, statistik gebet
The members of a church in the USA chose at random 80 names from the telephone directory. Then the leader of the church asked the church to pray for those people for 90 days. At the same time he asked them, to select another 80 names from the telephone directory of the town by random. This second list of names was knowingly put aside and nobody prayed for these people. After 90 days all of these 160 people were contacted personally by phone by members of the church. They were asked, if they agreed that Christians could call round and pray for them. The astonishing (or perhaps not astonishing) result was this: Only one person from the list that was not prayed for was willing to receive the visit. From the list of names who were prayed for during 90 days 69 were willing to receive a visit from Christians. 45 of them even invited the Christians in their house, offered them coffee and were willing to name particular prayer requests.
5 Comments so far
Leave a comment
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Nice blog entry!
Comment by Jayred October 24, 2005 @ 5:32 pmI read your 10/2005 posting on how prayer can actually work. I think is so totally awesome, and although I know many people pray, I think everyone should know more about it!
Comment by Ann December 2, 2008 @ 6:22 amUnfortunately, this is not likely a valid study. Valid studies are never anonymous as this one is – “members of a church in the USA”. In true studies, the details of the study are available so that the methods and procedures can be scrutinized and duplicated. What church? What city? When was the time frame? Was it a double-blind study? All of this vital information is missing and, therefore, this claim should be treated with suspicion until the details are revealed.
This posting should have started something like this: “During a 2007 double-blind study conducted by the Hertitag Christian Center of Austin, Texas and monitored by the Statistics Department of the University of Texas, 80 names were chosen at random…”
Comment by Stan February 24, 2009 @ 4:56 pmRight! please visit:
http://www.godandscience.org/apologetics/prayer.html
Comment by Israel Ramirez May 15, 2009 @ 5:35 pmThank you all for your comments. A special thanks to Israel Ramirez who blessed the readers and me with an empirical study. What strikes me most is that remote intercessory prayers were in effect for a study group who did not know that they were prayed for in such a way. This is important for a scientific study since any personal motives of the intercessors, any relational or theological placebo effects (positive or negative) can be ruled out here. Right, Stan?
Comment by Climate Patrol May 28, 2009 @ 2:49 pm